Yes, that is true. In this particular case, squalene in much higher doses than being used in the vaccine is showing protective properties. I’ll take a look at the video tonight. The studies I looked at did not look into the systematic effect but one would imagine, when looking at multiple other agents under injection, the active is dispersed all over the body within seconds unless it is oil based. The gov is trying to do something, suggest vaccination. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

At 61, I have good hindsight, in part due to 8 years university biology/chemistry/math, near perfect record, and research using advanced statistical methods. The rest of it has to do with severe afflictions to family members that correlate perfectly with vaccinations, so if the gov is lying about the damages they cause, might they be lying about them preventing disease in the 1st place. That turns out to be the case, and the dif between the lie and the truth can be established.

Most certainly if the researchers were found to be providing incorrect data or dubious results by another research team they would be shamed and all their work would be assumed tainted. This is the beauty of the scientific method. Research can be done and then tested against and peer reviewed. Are you claiming that universities and other independent researchers are colluding in some grand conspiracy?

I am saying that by the standards of rigor required for advanced research in my thesis, ALL of the “scientific” data claiming to support vaccine effectiveness is fraud. “Peer” review these days follows the same pattern as the mass media. If the dogma isn’t supported by the facts, the facts are ignored. You really think anything has changed since Gallileo? Nor do universities necessarily represent independent research. Independent research doesn’t pay the bills.

It is also no secret that big pharma and big gov is up to its neck in blatant fraud which it represents as science. That isn’t at all difficult to determine and based on very solid fact, call it grand whatever you want. Take a look at Vioxx for starters. I dropped my own website on the matter after taking note of the number of other serious critics who were turning up dead.

Some of these studies showing positive results for the vaccine or protective properties of squalene are outside of the US. Do you really believe that they are part of the conspiracy as well? I understand that there is fraud in the system but how is it exposed? Through independent research. Facts can be hidden by corps that want to sell their product but sooner or later the truth comes out. Those cases were their own product, this case the materials are available to most labs.

We should also forget that there is no shortage of “peer” reviewed (whatever that means) articles that do demonstrate links between autism (however it might otherwise be diagnosed) and vaccinations, and if you are very knowledgeable on the matter, the gov itself has admitted as much often enough, though not openly. The US has even paid billions in settlements for vaccine injuries that incude autism, but these are peanuts compared to the damages otherwise ignored while a blind eye is yet turned.

Very few people, mostly even those who consider themselves scientifically literate, have any comprehension of what rigorous research designs consists of, how to recognize or interpret it. They only tend to believe what they’ve read. In this matter, you’re way behind (not to insult you in any way) – study all of these things in great detail, you’ve a long way to go: fluoride (does NOT prevent tooth decay), aspartame, GMO foods – I graduated from the “system” that supports these outmoded notions.

You should understand what peer review means with all the schooling you had. I’ve looked at the information available and there have not been proven cases of autism from vaccinations, not in any research journal and many have tried to look into this matter. I prefer not to believe in a grand conspiracy that is holding the truth back and forcing labs to change data to show the efficacy of the vaccine or components. I prefer to look at the material out there so please provide links.

Oh, yes, but I’m NOT going to spend days digging through hundreds of “peer reviewed” articles on the matter for those that satisfy you There are plenty of those as well as court cases, although the specific diagnosis of autism is often omitted in favor of ?. Sorry, but there is a grand conspiracy. I suggest that you start doing your own research, maybe tap into some of the yahoo groups with thousands of parents with vaccine damaged kids, many autistic.